|
以純文字方式查看主題
- 昆蟲論壇 (http://insectforum.no-ip.org/gods/cgi-bin/leobbs.cgi) |
|
-- 作者： endian 機器智慧設計必讀 [1 paradox]Why 0.999... is not equal to 1? Written in 2012 The current mathematic theory tells us, 1>0.9, 1>0.99, 1>0.999, ..., but at last it says 1=0.999..., a negation of itself (Proof 0.999... =1: 1/9=0.111..., 1/9x9=1, 0.111...x9=0.999..., so 1=0.999...). So it is totally a paradox, name it as 【1 paradox】. You see this is a mathematic problem at first, actually it is a philosophic problem. Then we can resolve it. Because math is a incomplete theory, only philosophy could be a complete one. The answer is that 0.999... is not equal to 1. Because of these reasons: 1. The infinite world and finite world. We live in one world but made up of two parts: the infinite part and the finite part. But we develop our mathematic system based on the finite part, because we never entered into the infinite part. Your attention, God is in it. 0.999... is a number in the infinite world, but 1 is a number in the finite world. For example, 1 represents an apple. But then 0.999...? We don't know. That is to say, we can't use a number in the infinite world to plus a number in the finite world. For example, an apple plus an apple, we say it is 1+1=2, we get two apples, but if it is an apple plus a banana, we only can say we get two fruits. The key problem is we don't know what is 0.999..., we can get nothing. So we can't say 9+0.999...=9.999... or 10, etc. We can use "infinite world" and "finite world" to resolve some of zeno's paradox, too. 2. lim0.999...=1, not 0.999...=1. 3.The indeterminate principle. Because of the indeterminate principle, 1/9 is not equal to 0.111.... For example, cut an apple into nine equal parts, then every part of it is 1/9. But if you use different measure tools to measure the volume of every part, it is indeterminate. That is to say, you may find the volume could not exactly be 0.111..., but it would be 0.123, 0.1142, or 0.11425, etc. Now we end a biggest mathematical crisis. But most important is this standpoint tells us, our world is only a sample from a sample space. When you realized this, and that the current probability theory is wrong, when you find the Meta-sample-space, you would be able to create a real AI-system. It will indicate that there must be one God-system in the system, which is the controller. Look our world, there must be one God, as for us, only some robots. Maybe we are in a God's game, WHO KNOWS? 相關閱讀： More info, two other download points(written in Chinese): [UploadFile=AIforSC_1372495005.txt]
-- 作者： yichance1
山似山不是山
-- 作者： 基隆林
山似山不是山 <-- 這個不懂 求解 !!!
-- 作者： y368966
[quote][b]下面引用由[u]基隆林[/u]在 [i]2013/06/30 10:50:25am[/i] 發表的內容：[/b]
-- 作者： yichance1
看山似山不是山,我也是聽來的
-- 作者： y368966 昆論目前 註冊會員總數: 30323 人 這當中 有 30020 人 看山是山 有 273 人 看山不是山 有 29 人 看山還是山 您在哪座山 呀 !
-- 作者： 黃金甲
為何這篇我什麼都看不到？
-- 作者： 基隆林 我在山東 ...
-- 作者： y368966
[quote][b]下面引用由[u]主席[/u]在 [i]2013/07/02 12:32:00pm[/i] 發表的內容：[/b]
-- 作者： 黃金甲
登天下而泰山小
-- 作者： 基隆林 您們都笑 ki 喔 ...
-- 作者： senna
[quote][b]下面引用由[u]基隆林[/u]在 [i]2013/07/02 12:32:00pm[/i] 發表的內容：[/b] ?? 真的假的??
-- 作者： 基隆林 回來了啦 ... 您真是消息不靈通 @@|||
-- 作者： y368966 露露 嗅覺 很好 啊 ~ 誰來了 她都知道
-- 作者： 基隆林 偶在北部, 牠在南部 ...
|